Every battle between armies results in success for one side failure for one side. There is a winner and there is a loser (ignoring ties). That means 50% of battles are a success, and 50% of battles are failures.
In contrast, 60-70% of projects fail (according to popularised stats).
In other words, armies do better at succeeding against obstacles that ACTIVELY aim to LITERALLY devastate and rip them apart, than projects do against the comparatively passive triple constraints.
(I know there's fatal flaws in this argument, but still).
No comments:
Post a Comment